Report of the Independent External Auditor continued
To address the pervasive risk as it relates to management
override, we performed procedures including:
•
identifying journal entries and other adjustments to test
based on risk criteria and comparing the identified entries
tosupporting documentation. These included those posted
by unauthorized users, approved by unauthorized approvers,
those posted and approved by the same user, those
including specific words based on our risk criteria, those
journals which were unbalanced, those with no descriptions
oruser IDs, those posted to seldom used accounts, unusual
journal entries posted to cash accounts. Identifying
journalentries and other adjustments to test based on risk
criteria and comparing the identified entries tosupporting
documentation. These included those posted by unauthorised
users, approved by unauthorised approvers, those posted
and approved by the same user, those including specific
words based on our risk criteria, those journals which were
unbalanced, those with no descriptions or user IDs, those
posted to seldom used accounts, unusual journal entries
posted to cash accounts; and
•
assessing significant accounting estimates for bias.
Identifying and responding to risks of material
misstatement due to non-compliance with laws
and regulations
We identified areas of laws and regulations that could
reasonably be expected to have a material effect on the
Solvency and Financial Condition Report from our general
commercial and sector experience, and through discussion
with management, and from inspection of the Group’s and
Company’s regulatory and legal correspondence and we
discussed with management the policies and procedures
regarding compliance with laws and regulations.
We communicated identified laws and regulations throughout
our team and remained alert to any indications of non-
compliance throughout the audit.
The potential effect of these laws and regulations on the
Solvency and Financial Condition Report varies considerably.
Firstly, the Group and Company are subject to laws and
regulations that directly affect the Solvency and Financial
Condition Report including financial reporting legislation
(related to PRA and Solvency II regulations) , and we assessed
the extent of compliance with these laws and regulations as
part of our procedures on the related financial statement items.
Secondly, the Group and Company are subject to many
other laws and regulations where the consequences of
non-compliance could have a material effect on amounts or
disclosures in the Solvency and Financial Condition Report,
for instance through the imposition of fines or litigation. We
identified the following areas as those most likely to have
such as effect: regulatory capital and liquidity requirements,
GDPR compliance, Health and Safety legislation, Employment
and Social Security legislation, Fraud, corruption and bribery
legislation, Misrepresentation Act, Environmental protection
legislation, including emissions trading & Climate Change Act
2008 and certain aspects of company legislation recognizing
the financial nature of the Group’s and Company’s activities
and its legal form. Auditing standards limit the required audit
procedures to identify non-compliance with these laws and
regulations to enquiry of the directors and inspection of
regulatory and legal correspondence, if any. Therefore, if
abreach of operation regulations is not disclosed to us or
evident from relevant correspondence, an audit will not
detect a breach.
Context of the ability of the audit to detect
fraudor breaches of law or regulation:
Owing to the inherent limitations of an audit, there is an
unavoidable risk that we may not have detected some
material misstatements in the Solvency and Financial
Condition Report, even though we have properly planned
and performed our audit in accordance with auditing
standards. For example, the further removed non-compliance
with laws and regulations is from the events and transactions
reflected in the Solvency and Financial Condition Report,
theless likely the inherently limited procedures required by
auditing standards would identify it.
In addition, as with any audit, there remained a higher risk
ofnon-detection of fraud, as these may involve collusion,
forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the
override of internal controls. Our audit procedures are
designed to detect material misstatement. We are not
responsible for preventing non-compliance or fraud and
cannot be expected to detect non- compliance with all
lawsand regulations.
Other Information
The Directors of the Entities are responsible for their
relevantcontent of the Other Information.
Our opinion on the information subject to audit in the
Relevant Elements of the Solvency and Financial Condition
Report does not cover the Other Information and, accordingly,
we do not express an audit opinion or any form of assurance
conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the information subject
toaudit in the Relevant Elements of the Solvency and
FinancialCondition Report, our responsibility is to read
theOther Information and, in doing so, consider whether
theOther Information is materially inconsistent with the
information subject to audit in the Relevant Elements of the
Solvency and Financial Condition Report, or our knowledge
obtained in the audit, orotherwise appears to be materially
misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or
apparent material misstatements, we are required to
determine whether there is a material misstatement in
theinformation subject to auditin the Relevant Elements of
the Solvency and Financial Condition Report or a material
misstatement of the Other Information. If, based on the work
we have performed, we conclude that there is a material
misstatement of this Other Information, we are required to
report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Responsibilities of Directors of the Entities for
theSolvency and Financial Condition Report
The Directors of the Entities are responsible for the preparation
of their relevant content of the Solvency and Financial
Condition Report in accordance with the financial reporting
provisions of the PRA rules and Solvency II regulations which
have been modified by the modifications and supplemented
by the approvals and determinations made by the PRA
under section 138A of FSMA, the PRA Rules and Solvency II
regulations on which they are based.
Pension Insurance Corporation Group Limited | Solvency and Financial Condition Report 202204