Pension Insurance Corporation Group Limited | Solvency and Financial Condition Report 202104
Identifying and responding to risks of material misstatement
due to non-compliance with laws and regulations
We identified areas of laws and regulations that could
reasonably be expected to have a material effect on the
Group Solvency and Financial Condition Report from our
general commercial and sector experience ,and through
discussion with management, and from inspection of the
Group’s and Company’s regulatory and legal
correspondence, and discussed with management the
policies and procedures regarding compliance with laws and
regulations.
We communicated identified laws and regulations
throughout our team and remained alert to any indications
of non-compliance throughout the audit.
The potential effect of these laws and regulations on the
Group Solvency and Financial Condition Report varies
considerably.
Firstly, the Group and Company are subject to laws and
regulations that directly affect the Group Solvency and
Financial Condition Report including financial reporting
legislation (including related companies legislation),
distributable profits legislation, and taxation legislation and
we assessed the extent of compliance with these laws and
regulations as part of our procedures on the related financial
statement items.
Secondly, the Group and Company are subject to many
other laws and regulations where the consequences of
non-compliance could have a material effect on amounts or
disclosures in the Group Solvency and Financial Condition
Report, for instance through the imposition of fines or
litigation. We identified the following areas as those most
likely to have such as effect: liquidity and certain aspects of
company legislation recognizing the financial nature of the
Group’s and Company’s activities and its legal form. Auditing
standards limit the required audit procedures to identify
non-compliance with these laws and regulations to enquiry
of the directors and inspection of regulatory and legal
correspondence, if any. Therefore, if a breach of operation
regulations is not disclosed to us or evident from relevant
correspondence, an audit will not detect a breach.
No other matters related to actual or suspected to breaches
of laws or regulations, for which disclosure is not necessary,
were identified.
Context of the ability of the audit to detect fraud or breaches
of law or regulation
Owing to the inherent limitations of an audit, there is an
unavoidable risk that we may not have detected some
material misstatements in the financial statements, even
though we have properly planned and performed our audit
in accordance with auditing standards. For example, the
further removed non-compliance with laws and regulations
is from the events and transactions reflected in the financial
statements, the less likely the inherently limited procedures
required by auditing standards would identify it.
In addition, as with any audit, there remained a higher risk of
non-detection of fraud, as these may involve collusion,
forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the
override of internal controls. Our audit procedures are
designed to detect material misstatement. We are not
responsible for preventing non-compliance or fraud and
cannot be expected to detect non-compliance with all laws
and regulations.
Other Information
The Directors are responsible for the Other Information.
Our opinion on the Relevant Elements of the Group Solvency
and Financial Condition Report does not cover the Other
Information and, accordingly, we do not express an audit
opinion or any form of assurance conclusion thereon.
In connection with our audit of the Group Solvency and
Financial Condition Report, our responsibility is to read the
Other Information and, in doing so, consider whether the
Other Information is materially inconsistent with the Relevant
Elements of the Group Solvency and Financial Condition
Report, or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise
appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such
material inconsistencies or apparent material
misstatements, we are required to determine whether there
is a material misstatement in the Relevant Elements of the
Group Solvency and Financial Condition Report or a material
misstatement of the Other Information. If, based on the work
we have performed, we conclude that there is a material
misstatement of this other information, we are required to
report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.
Responsibilities of Directors for the Group
Solvency and Financial Condition Report
The Directors are responsible for the preparation of the
Group Solvency and Financial Condition Report in
accordance with the financial reporting provisions of the
PRA rules and Solvency II regulations which have been
modified by the modifications, and supplemented by the
approvals and determinations made by the PRA under
section 138A of FSMA, the PRA Rules and Solvency II
regulations on which they are based.
The Directors are also responsible for such internal control as
they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of a
Group Solvency and Financial Condition Report that is free
from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error;
assessing the company’s ability to continue as a going
concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going
concern; and using the going concern basis of accounting
unless they either intend to liquidate the company or to cease
operations, or have no realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the
Relevant Elements of the Group Solvency and
Financial Condition Report
It is our responsibility to form an independent opinion as to
whether the Relevant Elements of the Group Solvency and
Financial Condition Report are prepared, in all material
respects, with financial reporting provisions of the PRA Rules
and Solvency II regulations on which it they based, as
modified by relevant supervisory modifications, and as
supplemented by supervisory approvals and determinations.
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the Relevant Elements of the Group Solvency and
Financial Condition Report are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an
auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable
assurance is a high level of assurance, but it is not a
guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs
(UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it
exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are
considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they
could reasonably be expected to influence the decision
making or the judgement of the users taken on the basis of
the Relevant Elements of the Group Solvency and Financial
Condition Report.
Report of the Independent External Auditor continued